Alliances of maritime liner container carriers: the essence of this phenomenon and its practical significance
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-1-25-44-51
Abstract
Alliances are a key element of modern liner shipping. This article introduces alliances as a new form of consolidation of container lines and offers general information about their activity. The authors examined numerous reliable sources to evaluate different factors which influence the results of shipping lines' participation in global alliances. The authors offer their appraisal of alliances based on research as well as their own experience in shipping. They consider the liner market as an oligopoly of a few companies, which are closely intertwined with the world’s largest corporations and where international law has been substituted with a control by regulators from some of the most powerful countries in the liner trade. This system allows the business of some customers to be protected, while applying limitations on others. Undoubtedly, the alliances have an influence on Russian foreign trade. In summary, the authors believe that the Russian authorities should carefully investigate and control the service of global carriers and alliances. The chief aim of effective control is the free participation of Russian companies in foreign trade, which is not possible without due support of maritime transport. The alliances are truly global entities. They combine both traditional and new methods, including cutting-edge capabilities of information and digital technologies. To prevent a negative influence of the oligopoly, a new international initiative to regulate the alliances as was done with shipping conferences is highly welcomed by the authors.
About the Authors
A. G. NeiogovRussian Federation
Andrey G. Nelogov
Dvinskaya str., 5/7, St. Petersburg, 198035
A. Ouami
Russian Federation
Abdeljalil Ouami
Dvinskaya str., 5/7,
St. Petersburg, 198035
References
1. United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on a Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences, held at Geneva from 12 November to 15 December 1973 (1st part) and from 11 March to 6 April 1974 (2nd part). Volume 2. Final act (including the Convention and resolutions) and tonnage requirements: corrigendum. TD/CODE/13/Add.1, New York: UN/UNCTAD, 1975.
2. Federal Maritime Commission, Bureau of Trade Analysis. Study of the 2008 Repeal of the Liner Conference Exemption from European Union Competition Law. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, USA. 2012. 364 p. https://fmc2.fmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/FMC_EU_Study_508compliant.pdf
3. Tenishev A. P., Khamukov M. A. Cartels in liner shipping: an evolution or a transformation? // Maritime Fleet, 2015. No. 5. P. 28—32 (In Russ.)
4. Antimonopoly regulation in digital era. Tsarikovskiy A. Yu., Ivanov A. Yu., Voinikanis E. A. 2nd Ed., M.: Publishing House of High Economic School, 2019. 391 p. (In Russ.)
5. Rusinov I. A., Nelogov A. G., Gavrilova I. A. The USA policy in the field of liner shipping. The USA ocean shipping regulation act of 1998 (OSRA) // Bulletin of Transport Information. 2018. No. 3 (273). P 3—9 (In Russ.)
6. Federal Maritime Commission. The Impact of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998. Washington, DC, U.S.A. 2001. 87 p. https://fmc2.fmc.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/OSRA_Study.pd
7. Zollo M., Reuer J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances // Organization Science. 2002. Vol. 13 (6). P. 701—713.
8. White S., Lui S. Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances // Strategic Manage- ment Journal. 2005. Vol. 26 (10). P. 913—932. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.490
9. Lee E-S., Song D-W. Knowledge management for maritime logistics Value: discussing conceptual issues // Maritime Policy and Management. 2010. Vol. 37 (6), 2010. P. 563—583. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.514959
10. Lee E.-S. and Song D.-W. The effect of shipping knowledge and absorptive capacity on organizational innovation and logistics value. The International Journal of Logistics Management. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 218—237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2013-0011
11. Review of Maritime Transport. UNCTAD/RMT. United Nations Publications, New York, USA. 1969—2020. https://unctad.org/topic/transport-and-trade-logistics/review-of-maritime-transport
12. Rusinov I. A., Gavrilova I. A., Nelogov A. G. Freight conferences in a nutshell // Morskoy vestnik. 2016. № 2 (58). P. 113—116 (In Russ.)
13. Rusinov I. A., Gavrilova I. A., Nelogov A. G. Regarding the control of liner shipping based on the analysis of the un convention principles of the code of conduct for liner conference // Vestnik Gosudarstven-nogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni ad-mirala S. O. Makarova 2016. 3 (37): 53—64 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2016-7-3-53-64
14. Pinder D., Slack B. Shipping and Ports in the Twenty-first Century. Routledge, London, UK. 2012. 1st Ed. 304 p.
15. Buckley J. J. The Business of Shipping. Cornell Maritime Press/Tidewater Pub., Centreville, MD, U.S.A. 2008. 8th Ed. 448 p.
16. International Transport Forum. ITF/OECD. The Impact of Alliances in Container Shipping. Paris, France. 2018. 162 p. https://www.itf-oecd.org/impact-alliances-container-shipping
17. Stopford M. Maritime Economics. Routledge, London, UK. 2008. 3rd Ed. 555 р.
18. Guidelines towards the application of the Convention on a Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences UNCTAD/ST/SHIP/1. Geneva, Switzerland. 1987. 106 p. (In Russ.)
19. Commentary on the Merchant Shipping Code of the Russian Federation / Ivanov G. G. Doctor of Law, Professor, and others. 2nd Ed., M.: Spark, 2005. 830 p. (In Russ.)
20. Petrovskiy V. V. Liner Shipping. M.: Transport Publishing House, 1977. 288 p. (In Russ.)
21. Kendall L. C. The Business of Shipping. 1st Russian Ed. M.: Transport Publishing House, 1978. 264 p. (In Russ.)
22. Kendall L. C. The Business of Shipping. Cornell Maritime Press, Inc., Centreville, MD, U. S. A. 1986. 5th Ed. 512 p.
Review
For citations:
Neiogov A.G., Ouami A. Alliances of maritime liner container carriers: the essence of this phenomenon and its practical significance. Russian competition law and economy. 2021;(1):44-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-1-25-44-51