Public Control as a Tool of Combating Unfair Competition in the Sphere of Public Procurement
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-1-25-60-67
Abstract
In this article discussed basic concept of Russian public procurement. Also stated the problem of monopsony byer power during tendering procedures or unfair competition in the sphere of public procurement. This happenes when byer sets restricting parameters on technical requirement documents for tendering objects. Accordingly, in the authors’ view the most effective way of counteracting this problem is public control. This article contains results of the survey that was made during the research that suggest an almost direct correlation between nominal saving and number of complaints filed against the organizer of public procurement procedures. Moreover, this article contains overview on the Russian public control institution. The article ends with a authors idea of efficient in combating monopsony byer power in public procurement by creating a special internet service for filling complaints and suggestions of public procurement stakeholders. This data hub will increase efficiency of interaction between stakeholders, organizers and government.
About the Authors
O. Yu. Kirillova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oksana Yu. Kirillova
Stremyannyy lane, 36, Moscow, 117997
R. M. Khalfin
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ruslan M. Khalfin
Stremyannyy lane, 36, Moscow, 117997
G. K. Malyshev
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Georgiy K. Malyshev
Stremyannyy lane, 36, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Adodina A. O. Influence of democracy level of a country on an innovative potencial of economy // National economy interests: priorities and safety. Vol. 8. 2012. No. 12 (153). P 44—48 (In Russ.)
2. Gavrilova I. N. Public control in Russia within the framework of basic democracy. Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law. 2014;7(6):110—119 (In Russ.)
3. Evsikov K. S. Problems and prospects for development of institute of public control in the Russian Federation // News of the Tula state university. Economic and legal sciences. 2017. No. 4—2. P. 139— 151 (In Russ.)
4. Kupryashin G. L. Public administration // Political science. 2016. No. 2. P 101—131 (In Russ.)
5. Mironenko G. A. Formation of the state order in Russia // International journal of applied sciences and technologies “Integral”online journal. 2019. No. 4—1. P 193—199 (In Russ.)
6. Skvirskij I. О. Institute of public control in Ukraine and legal nature thereof // Administrative Law and Procedure. 2013. No. 2. P 62—65 (In Russ.)
7. Filatova I. I. Public control as vector of formation and development of civil society // Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2014. No. 2 (130). P. 45—50 (In Russ.)
8. Almond Gabriel A. Capitalism and Democracy. PS: Political Science and Politics. Vol. 24. No. 3. 1991. P. 467—74. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/420091 Accessed: 13 July 2020.
9. Sanchez-Graells, Albert and Herrera Anchustegui, Ignacio, Impact of Public Procurement Aggregation on Competition: Risks, Rationale and Justification for the Rules in Directive 2014/24 (December 5, 2014). University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 14—35, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2534496 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2534496
Review
For citations:
Kirillova O.Yu., Khalfin R.M., Malyshev G.K. Public Control as a Tool of Combating Unfair Competition in the Sphere of Public Procurement. Russian competition law and economy. 2021;(1):60-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-1-25-60-67
Views:
476
Email this article 