Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Warning of the Antimonopoly Authority in the System of State Enforcement Measures
EDN: KLONES
Abstract
The institution of prevention was investigated as a response of the antimonopoly authority in identifying signs of violation of antimonopoly legislation. The possibility of classifying this measure as measures of state coercion, as well as the legal nature of its application, was assessed.
Taking into account the targeted focus of the warning of the antimonopoly authority, it was concluded that it should be classified as a form of administrative and preventive measures, containing in some cases signs of legal recovery measures.
A particular discrepancy was revealed between the purpose of applying this measure and the form of its implementation provided for by law.
To eliminate this contradiction, the author formulated proposals for improving the legislative consolidation of the institution of prevention.
About the Author
Oksana N. Kuznetsova
FAS Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya str., 11, Moscow, 125993.
References
1. Scientific and practical commentary on the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” / K.N. Aleshin, E.A. Bolshakov, V.V. Vladimirov [et al.]; Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Federal Antimonopoly Service. 2nd edition, revised and supplemented. M.: STATUTE, 2016. 1024 p. ISBN 978-5-8354-1287-7. (In Russ.). EDN YOPSAD
2. Alekseeva A., Borzilo E., Korneev V. [et al.] Updating the concept of antitrust regulation (part 1) // Herald of Economic Justice. 2022;(5):106-149. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2022-17-5-106-149. EDN SDNTQQ
3. Alekseeva A., Borzilo E., Korneev V. [et al.] Updating the concept of antitrust regulation (part 2) // Herald of Economic Justice. 2022;(6):41-104. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2022-17-6-41-104. EDN HPPYAY
4. Alekseeva A., Borzilo E., Korneev V. [et al.] Updating the concept of antitrust regulation (part 3) // Herald of Economic Justice. 2022;(7):138-189. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37239/2500-2643-2022-17-7-138-189. EDN CFSYVZ
5. Lapina M.A., Karpukhin D.V., Kurakin A.V. Application of administrative coercion for violation of legislation on protection of competition // Modern Law. 2018;(12):42-49. (In Russ.)]
6. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I.V. Administrative law measures in the sphere of competition protection // Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2014;(2):31-38. (In Russ.)
7. Kozhevnikov S.N. State compulsion: the essential aspects // Sociopolitical Sciences. 2017;(3):71-74. (In Russ.). EDN YUBWNJ
8. Kozhevnikov S.N. State coercion: regulatory and protective purpose, forms // Juridical World. 2010;(9):43-50. (In Russ.)
9. Starostin S.A. Administrative coercion: problems of theory, legislation and practice // Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2021;(39):93-108. (In Russ.)
10. Tsareva G.B. Legal nature of taking preventiv measures in the administrative and jurisdictional process // Journal of Public and Municipal Administration. 2012;(4):81-87. (In Russ.)
11. Savitskaya I.G. Problems of applying the institution of warning of termination of actions containing signs of violation of the antimonopoly legislation of the Russian Federation // Arbitration disputes. 2020;(4):45-56. (In Russ.)
12. Poteeva A. Warning of the antimonopoly authority: problems of law enforcement // Competition and law. 2013;(6):9-13. (In Russ.)
13. Grishin D.A. On the correlation between the categories of the “form”, “type” and “means” of administrative coercion // Administrative Law and Process. 2021;(12):16-20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2021-12-16-20
14. Korenev A.P. Administrative law of Russia. Part of it is common. M.: Shield-M. 1997. 280 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kononov P.I. Actual problems of administrative law / P.I. Kononov. M.: KnoRus, 2023. 314 p. (Magistracy). ISBN 978-5-406-11399-8. (In Russ.). EDN SLYIMG]
16. Responsibility in the legal system: Textbook / A.P. Chirkov; Kaliningr. state. un-t. Kaliningrad: KSU, 1996. 73 p. (In Russ.)
17. Spirin D.S. Legal restoration measures in the system of legal coercive influence // Education and Law. 2024;(10):164-167. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2024-10-164-167
18. Kuznetsova O.N. Preventive antitrust control measures in the legislation of the CIS member states // Russian Competition Law and Economy. 2024;(3):20-31. (In Russ.)
19. Timoshenko A.S. Conciliation procedures in the activities of the FAS Russia: present and future // Russian Competition Law and Economy. 2025;(3):14-23. (In Russ.). EDN XCAIHY
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsova O.N. Warning of the Antimonopoly Authority in the System of State Enforcement Measures. Russian competition law and economy. 2025;(4):8-16. (In Russ.) EDN: KLONES
Views:
20
Email this article 