Problems of Providing Preferences to Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in the Field of Public procurement (Including in the Light of the Pandemic): Foreign and Russian Experience
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2020-3-23-44-49
Abstract
Among the most highly sought measures of public support of businesses are various preferences to small-scale businesses as part of the public procurement of goods and services. In light of the new coronavirus pandemic there is an active discussion of the measures related to supporting the small- and medium-scale business entities with the use of the public procurement institution. However, taking such measures may presuppose significant inherent risks, including those related to potential or real limitation of competition. In their work the authors analyze the global experience of preferential programs for small- and medium-scale business entities through public procurement, as well as specific features peculiar to the Russian legal order which may be of importance during introduction of the said measures.
About the Authors
K. A. Ionkina
Institute of the National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Karina A. Ionkina
109028, Russia, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard, 11, office M205
A. A. Konovtsev
Institute of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, FAS of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Konovtsev
109028, Russia, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard, 11, office M205
125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya str., 11
O. A. Moskvitin
Institute of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners Law Firm
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Moskvitin
109028, Russia, Moscow, Pokrovsky Boulevard, 11, office M205
105005, Russia, Moscow, Denisovsky Lane, 23, bldg 6
References
1. Egorova M. A. Antimonopoly regulation of the activities of small and medium-sized business entities // Journal of entrepreneurship and corporate law. 2018. No. 2. P. 24—27 (Russia).]
2. Marion J. Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions // Journal of Public Economics. 2007. Vol. 91. No. 7. Р. 1591—1624.
3. Krasnokutskaya E., Seim K. Bid preference programs and participation in highway procurement auctions // American Economic Review. 2011. Vol. 101. No. 6. P. 2653—2686.
4. McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Government procurement and international trade // International Economics. 1989. Vol. 26. P. 291—308.
5. Nakabayashi J. Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of Public Procurement Auctions: diss. The Ohio State University, 2009.
6. Small and medium-sized businesses in Russia. 2019: Stat. sat. / Rosstat. M., 2019. URL: https://www.gks.ru/storage/mediabank/Mal-pred_2019.pdf (Date of request: 28.04.2020).
7. Ionkina K., Markova O., Morozov A. Tools of industrial policy in industries related to those affected by the coronavirus pandemic // Institute of competition policy and market regulation of the Higher School of Economics. URL: https://icpmr.hse.ru/news/358150254.html (Date accessed: 28.04.2020).
Review
For citations:
Ionkina K.A., Konovtsev A.A., Moskvitin O.A. Problems of Providing Preferences to Small and Medium-Sized Businesses in the Field of Public procurement (Including in the Light of the Pandemic): Foreign and Russian Experience. Russian competition law and economy. 2020;(3):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2020-3-23-44-49
Views:
369
Email this article 