Legal consequences of refusal of public procurement authority to conclude the contract with the winner of the competitive procurement procedure
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2020-4-24-60-68
Abstract
This article proposes to consider the debatable question regarding the legal consequences associated with the refusal of public procurement authority to conclude an agreement with the winner of the competitive procurement procedure conducted in accordance with the Federal Law dated 18.07.2011 No. 223 — FZ “On the procurement of goods, work, services by certain types of legal entities” (hereinafter — “Law No. 223”, the Law on Corporate Procurement). The article doubts the attempts to justify from the current legislation standpoint the existence of the obligation of the public procurement authority to conclude an agreement with the winner of the competitive procurement procedure provided with the possibility of judicial enforcement. In the absence of such an obligation, the author suggests to review the legal measures available to the winner of the competitive procurement procedure in order to protect its interests. At the same time, the article states that such measures are insufficient to the best interests of the winner of the competitive procurement procedure and does not comply with the public nature of relations in the field of corporate procurement. It is proposed to amend the Law on Corporate Procurement to eliminate these inconsistencies.
About the Author
S. S. DombaevRussian Federation
Salambek S. Dombaev
Sukhanova str., 8, Vladivostok, 690091
Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991
References
1. OECD (2016), OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, 2015 Edition: (Russian version), OECD Publishing, Paris. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264263680-ru)
2. Belyaeva O.A. Bidding: theoretical framework and practical issues (monography). M: The Institute of legislation and comparitive law under the Government of the Russian Federation: INFRA-M, 2015, available in informationreporting system "Garant".
3. Bragingskiy M.I. Contract law. Book 1 General provisions / V.V. Vitryanskiy, M.I. Braginskiy. 3d edition, M.: Statut. 2011.
4. Tasalov F.A. Request for Quotation and Request for Proposals as a Bidding Form // Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018. № 5 (90). P. 126—135 (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2018.90.5.126-135.
5. Contracts and obligations (general part): article-by-article commentary to articles 307—453 of the Civil code of the Russian Federation / Pub. Editor A.G. Karapetov. M.: M-Logos, 2017.
Review
For citations:
Dombaev S.S. Legal consequences of refusal of public procurement authority to conclude the contract with the winner of the competitive procurement procedure. Russian competition law and economy. 2020;(4):60-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2020-4-24-60-68