Legal uncertainty correlating acts of antimonopoly authorities concerning the abuse of dominant positioning and acts of arbitral courts in consideration of civil legal disputes
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-3-27-40-45
Abstract
A significant number of antitrust cases against company holding a dominant position on the product market, whose actions infringe upon both business entities, including representatives of small and medium-sized businesses, and an indefinite circle of persons, are implicated by the presence of civil disputes with applicants who have applied to the antimonopoly authority. The article analyzes the mutual influence of acts of antimonopoly authorities and acts of arbitration courts in the consideration of civil disputes and proposes a solution to the problem of legal uncertainty.
About the Author
Ph. Ph. Kadymov
Department of Federal Antimonopoly Service in Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Philipp Ph. Kadymov
Myasnitsky pr., 4, bldg 1, Moscow,107078
References
1. I.Yu. Artemyev. Scientific and practical commentary to the Federal Law "On Protection of Competition" (article by article), 2nd edition, revised and supplemented. Moscow. Statut. 2016. P. 1048 (In Russ.)
2. Commentary on the practice of considering economic disputes (court and arbitration practice). (issue 25) (editor-in-chief V.F. Yakovlev) ("IZiSP", "CONTRACT", 2019. P. 240 (In Russ.)
3. On the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 4, 2021. No. 2 “On some issues arising in connection with the application of antimonopoly legislation by the courts” (Branch of the limited liability partnership Brian Cave Leighton Peisner (Russia) LLP in Moscow, Antimonopoly practice) (Prepared for the ConsultantPlus system, 2021, P. 7) (In Russ.)
4. Shajkheev T.I. Competence of the antimonopoly authority for the protection of competition: its features, limits and restrictions // Administrative Law. 2015. No. 4. P. 11—19 (In Russ.)
5. Borzilo E.Yu. Antitrust Risks of Entrepreneurial Activity: Scientific and Practical Guide. M. Statut. 2014. P. 291 (In Russ.)
6. Amangeldy A.A., Belyaeva O.A., Varlamova A.N. and others) (editor-in-chief A.V. Gabov) Competition in a market economy: the limits of freedom and restrictions: Monograph. M.: IZiSP, Jurisprudence, 2016. P. 384 (In Russ.)
7. Sukhorukov A.S. Antimonopoly legislation in the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation // Constitutional and municipal law. 2008. No. 13. P. 22—26 (In Russ.)
8. Shajkheev T.I. Protection of competition in judicial and administrative procedure: right of the suffered economic subject and obligationof the antimonopoly agency // Administrative Law and Procedure. 2014. No. 12. P. 65—67 (In Russ.)
9. Ivanova N.A. Consideration by arbitrazh courts of cases oncontesting decisions (rulings) of the antimonopolyagency: certain procedural aspects // Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2014. No. 12. P. 47—52 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kadymov P.P. Legal uncertainty correlating acts of antimonopoly authorities concerning the abuse of dominant positioning and acts of arbitral courts in consideration of civil legal disputes. Russian competition law and economy. 2021;(3):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-3-27-40-45
Views:
404
Email this article 