State and municipal preferences: impact on competition
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-3-27-84-89
Abstract
The article considers the institute of state and municipal from the point of view of its impact on competition. Based on the analysis of the legislation and practice of making decisions by the antimonopoly bodies on giving consent to the granting of state or municipal preferences, studying the experience of the European Union, it is concluded that there is a threat of restricting competition even if the antimonopoly body agrees to grant preferences. The importance of the antimonopoly body's assessment of the proportion of positive and negative consequences of such provision of preferences is noted.
About the Author
I. P. Bochinin
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya P. Bochinin
Sadovaya-Kudrunskaya str., 9, Moscow, 125993, Russia
References
1. Mukhin V. Yu. Granting State or Municipal Preferences: Issues of Law Enforcement // Competition Law. 2016. No. 1. P. 30—34 (In Russ.)
2. Korovina K. S. State or municipal preferences: the concept and the problems of providing // Competition Law. 2014. No. 3. P. 27—31 {In Russ.)
3. Shipunov V. A. Antimonopoly regulation of the provision of state and municipal preferences // Financial control. 2012. No. 8. URL: http://bujet.ru/article/196874.php (Аccessed: 04.07.2021) (In Russ.)
4. Plehanov D. A. On some issues concerning provisions of state and municipal preferences // Actual problems of Russian law. 2015. No. 9. P. 103—107 (In Russ.)
5. Plekhanov D. A. Protection of competition from anticompetitive acts, actions and agreements of state authorities and local self-government bodies (legal aspect): PhD Thesis. Moscow, 2019 (In Russ.)
6. Aleshin K. N., Artemyev I. Yu., Bolshakov E. A., etc. Scientific and practical commentary on the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition” (article-by-article) / Ed. by I. Y. Artemyev. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statute, 2016. Commentary to Article 19 (In Russ.)
7. Commission Notice on the notion of State aid as referred to in Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2016/C 262/01).
8. Nicolaides Ph. Distortion of competition in the field of state aid: from unnecessary aid to unnecessary distortion // European Competition Law Review. 2010. 31 (10). P. 402—409.
9. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I. V. On damage compensation in case of legitimate competition restriction in the Russian Federation // Entrepreneurial Law. 2021. No. 1. P. 66—74 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18572/1999-4788-2021-1-66-74
10. Seregin D. I. Application issues for the general prohibition of dominant position abuse // Competition Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 21—24 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Bochinin I.P. State and municipal preferences: impact on competition. Russian competition law and economy. 2021;(3):84-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2021-3-27-84-89
Views:
430
Email this article 