Current Positions of the Collegial Bodies of the FAS Russia on the Application of Antimonopoly Legislation in Cases of Misapplication of Dominance (on the Example of the Cases of the IV Quarter of 2022)
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2023-2-34-58-67
Abstract
This article reveals the modern attitudes of the Collegial bodies of the Federal Antimonopoly Service, used in the framework of the revision of decisions of territorial antimonopoly administrations on cases of misapplication of dominance.
It is important to note that the positions of the Collegial bodies of the FAS Russia are significant important in antimonopoly law enforcement practice. Interpretation of competition law by the appellate boards of the antimonopoly service, among other things, contributes to maintaining the uniformity of law enforcement practice and clarifying certain provisions of the antitrust law.
In this regard the cases considered by the Collegial bodies of the FAS Russia are important for the development of antitrust practice.
To disclose the current positions of the FAS Russia more fully and practically on various issues of antimonopoly enforcement, the article will analyze some examples of cases considered by the agency in the fourth quarter of 2022.
About the Authors
O. A. Moskvitin
Institute for Competition Policy and Market Regulation NRU HSE; NMC “Higher School of Tariff Regulation” REU named after G.V. Plekhanov; “Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners”; Competition Experts Association
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg A. Moskvitin
Denisovskiy lane, 23, bldg 6, Moscow, 105005
A. S. Berezgov
Institute for Competition Policy and Market Regulation NRU HSE; “Muranov, Chernyakov & Partners”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alim S. Berezgov
Denisovskiy lane, 23, bldg 6, Moscow, 105005
References
1. Gavrilov L.A., Kulik Y.V., Mikhalevich L.S. Consideration of the case of violation of antimonopoly legislation (Article 45) // Scientific and practical commentary on the Federal Law “On Protection of Competition.” 2nd ed. rev. and additional. MGIMO Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, FAS Russia. Оtv. ed. I.Yu. Artemyev, ed. I.V. Zolotarev, S.A. Puzyrevsky, E.S. Khokhlov, G.P. Chernyshev. M.: Statute, 2016. 1024 p., (In Russ.).
2. BashlakovNikolaev I.V., Maksimov S.V. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation on the application of antimonopoly legislation by the courts: scientific and practical commentary. Moscow: Prospekt. 2022. 184 p., (In Russ.).
3. Law and economic development: problems of state regulation of the economy: Monography // V.K. Andreev, L.V. Andreeva, K.M. Arslanov et al. Ed. V.A. Vaypan, M.A. Egorova. M.: Yustitsinform. 2017. 432 p., (In Russ.).
4. Article: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation “On some issues arising in connection with the application of antitrust law by the courts” (Branch of the limited liability partnership BKLP LLP in Moscow, Antimonopoly practice) // “Consultant Plus”. 2021, (In Russ.).
5. Handbook of evidence in the arbitration process // O.V. Aboznova, N.G. Belyaeva, T.L. Verbenko and others // Ed. I.V. Reshetnikova. 2nd ed. revised and additional. M.: Norma. INFRA-M. 2022. 480 p., (In Russ.).
6. Borisova L.N. An analysis of the commodity market as a competition development instrument: legal aspects // Law and Business. 2022;(1):6-8, (In Russ.).
7. Overview of the practice of considering complaints against decisions and orders of the departments of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of the Russian Federation, filed in accordance with part 6 of Article 23 of the Federal Law of July 26, 2006 No. 135-FL “On Protection of Competition” for the fourth quarter of 2017 // “Consultant Plus”. 2018, (In Russ.).
8. Smola A.A. Rulings of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the proper procedure for resolving cases in the antitrust authorities and their application by the courts // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2022;12(2):200-240, (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-2-200-240]
9. Moskvitin O.A., Bochinin I.P. The Interior Appeal of the FAS of Russia: the role of legal positions in the development of uniformity of law enforcement practice // Russian Competition Law and Economy. 2019;(3):78-83, (In Russ.).
10. Ivanova N.A. Decision and prescription of the antimonopoly body as objects of dispute in the “Arbitrazh” (State commercial) court // Actual Problems of Russian law. 2020;15(2):113-124, (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.111.2.113-124.
11. Egorova M.A. Legal regimes of anticompetitive actions: Monograph. M: Yustitsinform. 2021. 244 p., (In Russ.).
12. Article-by-article commentary to the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. Part one // R.V. Amelin, A.V. Kolokolov, M.D. Kolokolova and others. Under the general. ed. L.V. Chistyakova. Moscow: GrossMedia. ROSBUH. 2019. Vol. 2. 1337 p., (In Russ.).
13. Egorova M.A. Civil law consequences of violations of antimonopoly law: Monograph. M: Yustitsinform. 2020. 408 p., (In Russ.). The article was submitted: 28.04.2023 Approved after reviewing: 29.05.2023 Accepted for publication: 31.05.2023 Date of publication: 29.06.2023
14. Usenko O.V. The issue of evaluating the damage or income in illegal entrepreneurship investigation // Russian Investigator. 2020;(1):23-26, (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3783-2020-1-23-26.
Review
For citations:
Moskvitin O.A., Berezgov A.S. Current Positions of the Collegial Bodies of the FAS Russia on the Application of Antimonopoly Legislation in Cases of Misapplication of Dominance (on the Example of the Cases of the IV Quarter of 2022). Russian competition law and economy. 2023;(2):58-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2023-2-34-58-67
Views:
184
Email this article 