Qualification of Violations of Antitrust Laws in Parallel Imports of Goods: a Comparative Legal Aspect
https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-4-32-18-24
Abstract
The practice of the antimonopoly authorities of Russia and foreign countries in relation to violations in the field of parallel imports of goods has been studied. The problems of qualification of this type of offenses (including in the law enforcement practice of a number of foreign states) in terms of vertical agreements and abuse of dominant position are identified. The authors conclude that the positions of the antimonopoly authorities of Russia and a number of foreign countries are similar on the issue of abuse of the right of legal monopolies for trademarks: a legal monopoly for trademarks should not be a basis for abuse of the right by the right holder and restriction of the possibility of free movement of goods and services marked with trademarks. According to the authors, it is advisable to use the experience of foreign countries when qualifying violations in the field of parallel imports to Russia.
About the Authors
I. V. AkimovaRussian Federation
Irina V. Akimova
Presnenskaya nab., 6, bldg 2, Moscow, 123112
A. V. Garipova
Russian Federation
Azalia A. Garipova
Presnenskaya nab., 6, bldg 2, Moscow, 123112
References
1. Kozhemyakin D. V., Semenov A. V., Sklyarova Y. V. Report on the results of expert and analytical research. Analysis of the possibilities of the transition to the international principle of exhaustion of trademark rights in the Russian Federation: problems and solutions. 262 p., (In Russ.)
2. Zakharov G., Rucker V. Regulation of vertical agreements in Russia and the USA // Legal Insight. 2013:(2(18)). URL: http://legalinsight.ru/issue-archive/legal-insight-2-2013/?ysclid=lb6l947t4q262851008, (In Russ.)
3. Ingrid Vandenborre, Nick Wolfe, Parallel Imports: An overview of EU and national case law, 4 June 2015, e-Competitions Parallel imports, Art. Nо. 73444.
4. Jacob Borum, The Danish Competition Appeals Tribunal confirms decision concerning refusal of supply and restrictions to parallel trade within the railway engine spare part sector (Deutz), 9 December 2013, e-Competitions December 2013, Art. Nо. 66390
5. Desogus, C. Competition and Innovation in the EU Regulation of Pharmaceuticals: the case of parallel trade. 7 May 2010.
Review
For citations:
Akimova I.V., Garipova A.V. Qualification of Violations of Antitrust Laws in Parallel Imports of Goods: a Comparative Legal Aspect. Russian competition law and economy. 2022;(4):18-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-4-32-18-24